Essays on fairness in distributed teams

Most distributed-team scheduling problems are structural, not personal. These essays diagnose where the structures pull, and what teams can do about them, usually without new tooling.

Scheduling tools for distributed teams, compared honestly

24 August 2026 · 7 min read

Doodle, Calendly, When2meet, World Time Buddy and Google Calendar each solve a different scheduling problem, and mostly do not compete with each other. Which one you want depends on whether you are booking a stranger, polling a group, converting time zones, or rotating a recurring meeting fairly. Includes where we are not the right answer.

Read →

How to find the best time to schedule a meeting across time zones

24 August 2026 · 8 min read

The overlap window method: convert everyone’s working hours into one reference zone, take the latest start and the earliest finish, and read off the result. What to do when the overlap is empty, which it usually is past about a ten-hour spread, and how to keep a recurring meeting from settling on whoever complains least.

Read →

Why does the same person always take the early meeting?

22 May 2026 · 11 min read

A diagnostic essay on the drift that lands rotating meetings on the same one or two people every time. It isn't favouritism, it isn't a scheduling-tool bug, and it almost never gets noticed until someone quits. Five structural reasons it happens, the four properties a real fix has to have, and the five-minute retro exercise that catches most of the drift without any new tool.

Read →

Rotating on-call across timezones

22 May 2026 · 12 min read

A 6-person team on a 6-week rotation looks fair on paper. Then you actually count what each person absorbed, and one of them did roughly twice the work. Why weeks-of-rotation is the wrong unit, what to measure instead (out-of-hours minutes per quarter), why follow-the-sun isn't a fix, and the four operational moves that hold.

Read →

What is fairness scoring?

4 May 2026 · 8 min read

An explainer of the four-dimension model that powers FairlyRemote: accommodation, flexibility, social time, and rest quality. Why scheduling tools that don't model sleep produce unfair meeting times, what monthly accommodation budgets do, how the decay function keeps last year's history from haunting this year's votes, and what the score explicitly does not predict.

Read →

See the ideas in a working product

You and four teammates across four timezones, with a week of meetings already in place. No signup, no card.